ACe Talking: Saying hello to a new crowd.
After a two-year absence, ACe Talking returns in time to say farewell to the first of the many bear rallies (mini-bull markets) we will see over the next 15 years or so. For those who have read this comment before, you will recall that stock markets are split roughly into 18 year periods of bull and bear, and the last bull endured from 1982-2000, with the 1966-1982 period (ok, 16 years. That's close enough) being the bear before that, and 1949-66 being the bull before that.
Looking at the current situtation in the U.S. markets brings Japan post-bubble into mind. I wouldn't get too bogged down with similarities here, but more in the behaviour of the indices themselves. Japan is a good comparison because it is the freshest bubble market in the limited mind I have. If I had a broader mind, I would remember the bubble in the Gold market in the early 1980's. Here, we saw the price of gold move from $170 an ounce in 1978 to a high of $850 in 1980, and then collapse by 43% in a few months to $480. We then saw a bounce of appx 50% to $700 by late 1980, before resuming its slide, hitting $300 in 1982, then bouncing 66% to $500 in 1983, before resuming the fall, moving back to $300 again by 1985. We then rallied back to $500 in 1987, and drifted back down to a low of $250 in 1999. Now taking 1980 away from 1999 doesn't quite give an answer of 18, but in my world, it gives the perfect answer, It says, in capital letters, that THERE ARE PLENTY OF MUGS OUT THERE WHO GOT SUCKED INTO A BUBBLE MARKET AND SPENT A HUGE CHUNK OF THEIR LIFE BELIEVING THAT THE BUBBLE DAYS WOULD COME BACK, AND PROBABLY THREW A BUNCH OF MONEY AWAY DOING SO.
Now let's revisit Japan. The Nikkei peaked in late 1989 at 39,000, then fell appx 30% over the next 18 months, before rallying 50% over the next 13 months, before a 24% fall very quickly, followed by a rebound, and then the resumed slide. Numerous 50% (and more) rallies later, and you have 2004. Now if we take 1990 away from 2004, we get 14, so in about 2008, it may be time to get excited. Not quite there yet, but it's closer than 2018, when the U.S. market (and the Europeans) resumes a sustainable bull phase. As for gold, it bottomed about 19 years after the top, and there's a bull market with about 13 years left to run, so WAKEY WAKEY.
Here is your first lesson in reading markets. You have to know your history. Believe me, there were plenty of believers out there in 1993, when the Nikkei was having it's first mini-bull. Even after another decline, the next bull, in 1995-96, which saw a 60% bounce, brought out the closet bulls. This was six years after the bull market ended, but the good times were still fresh in the memory. That's what bubble markets do. They turn intelligent investors into complete idiots, refusing to believe that the bull was over. Most of these have thrown in the towel now, but there are still one or two left about, and another 4 years for these poor souls to give in. Then we can get a new bull started.
Let's zoom forward to present day America. The S+P 500 is the most representitive of the major indices, and better than the Dow and Naz. To date, the S+P 500 has been almost identical in timing and percentage moves, to the Nikkei, with a 10-year lag. It had it's 50% bounce from the first lows, like Gold and the Nikkei before, and is now enjoying a nice little correction, which will be followed by a bounce, possible back to the 1140-60 area, before a nice slide back to the lows below 800. It's great to see so many mugs out there who believe all the hype being fed by the investment community. That is wonderful to behold, and will hopefully lead to lots of people losing plenty of wealth. We need wealth destruction to get a decent low on these markets in 2018 ish. I know that's a long time away, but there is plenty of wealth to be destroyed, and it will take a while to do that.
Let me give you a brief example of how investors can get sucked into the propoganda that is spouted by those above. Many people believe the figures showing that the U.S. economy grew by a healthy 4.4% in Q4 2003, but the truth may be way below. Goldman Sachs have just suggested that due to discrepancies in some economic numbers, Q4 2003 may have seen GDP at just 2.2%. Their senior economist, Jan Hatzius, has added his voice to the growing number of skeptics, who say that the growth figures are being overstated. Hatzius mentions "hedonic pricing", which I have read about several times in the past year. This is a method of calculating the contribution of certain sectors to GDP taking increased "quality" into account. For example, in computers, if the memory of a PC doubles, yet the price stays the same, the GDP figures will take a dollar amount that is doubled, not unchanged. That's plain daft, and totally unrepresentitive of what is really going on in the economy. It suits the powers that be, and it can fool many people into believing the economy is better than it is. In fact, it does, and it has!!
I see that Richard Russell is making a welcome return to the headlines. Richard is a real "God" in the investment community, having called the bottom in 1974, and the top in 2000, and at 79 years old, he has enough experience of bulls and bears to deserve respect. He says that "we are coming into one of the worst bear markets in history", and he uses Dow Theory to explain why we are now on the way down. Nice one Rich.
That's it for the moment. Remember the lesson. Go get a book or two about the history of investing. The last 25 years is a good guide to the next 25. You wait and see.
ACe